In the Canadian Income Tax decision Anchor Pointe Energy Ltd. (2006 TCC 424), the Tax Court of Canada concluded that the reverse onus (that requires the taxpayer to disprove Canada Revenue Agency’s assumed facts) did not apply to facts assumed by the minister subsequent to the expiration of the reassessment period. The court concluded that the normal-course rules relating to the reverse onus of proof do not apply where the Minister of Revenue first raises the factual assumptions at the confirmation stage. The Minister has the onus of proof for such assumptions of fact.
"This article provides information of a general nature only. It is only current at the posting date. It is not updated and it may no longer be current. It does not provide legal advice nor can it or should it be relied upon. All tax situations are specific to their facts and will differ from the situations in the articles. If you have specific legal questions you should consult a lawyer."