Published: January 9, 2026
The Canada Revenue Agency continues to monitor EFILE participation closely, particularly where preparers serve high-volume or vulnerable taxpayer groups. A recent Federal Court ruling involving a preparer whose EFILE privileges were suspended provides important guidance on how the Court reviews these decisions and what professionals can expect during a judicial review. This discussion offers clarity for accountants, entrepreneurs, and tax preparers who rely on electronic filing to maintain efficient business operations. An experienced Canadian tax lawyer can help interpret CRA expectations and reduce the risk of operational disruption.
Overview: How the EFILE Dispute Reached the Federal Court
The matter arose when a tax preparer was suspended from the EFILE program after continuing to electronically file returns for individuals who are excluded under CRA policy, including certain temporary foreign agricultural workers and deemed residents. CRA officials had previously warned the preparer not to submit returns for these groups electronically. After the initial suspension was overturned on judicial review and sent back for a fresh assessment, a different CRA officer reconsidered the file.
During the redetermination, the officer invited submissions and set deadlines, later receiving a request for additional time. Although there was no documented response to that extension request, the preparer ultimately filed further materials before the decision was finalized. After reviewing the updated information, the officer confirmed the suspension—this time relying on a separate suitability criterion tied to conduct following a prior suspension.
The preparer challenged the second decision, alleging procedural unfairness and an unreasonable analysis. The case proceeded to the Federal Court, which examined the CRA’s conduct through the lens of administrative law, a process that Canadian tax litigation lawyers regularly navigate.
How Federal Court Analyzes Fairness and Reasonableness
The Court upheld the CRA’s decision. It found that the preparer had been given meaningful opportunities to respond, including written notices and direct communication. Even though the extension request went unanswered, the Court emphasized that the preparer still filed submissions and that those submissions were considered. As a result, the fairness argument failed.
The Court also confirmed that CRA decision-makers conducting a fresh review are not bound by the original rationale. In this instance, the second officer applied a different suitability criterion based on conduct that occurred after warnings had been issued. The Court held that this shift did not undermine the decision’s reasonableness. It was supported by evidence and addressed the core issue: the preparer continued filing for excluded individuals after being instructed not to do so.
For Canadian preparers, this finding reinforces that CRA suitability assessments are contextual and may evolve as facts change. Expert Canadian tax lawyers routinely advise that ignoring a warning—whether related to EFILE, information requests, or compliance letters—can have rapid and lasting consequences.
Practical Impact on Tax Preparers and Businesses
Suspension from EFILE can interrupt refund timelines, impair client service, and create reputational challenges for accounting firms and preparers who rely on electronic filing. Entrepreneurs and small businesses served by these preparers may experience delays in tax refunds or assessment notices.
The decision also underscores that CRA uses EFILE criteria to protect system integrity. Preparers who work with groups such as temporary foreign workers or deemed residents must verify eligibility before using EFILE, as not all taxpayers can be filed electronically. CRA’s EFILE program overview provides guidance on which taxpayers are eligible for electronic filing.
A knowledgeable Canadian tax lawyer can assist in reviewing processes, understanding suitability expectations, and preparing for potential administrative disputes. For those engaged in tax litigation, the ruling demonstrates that a remitted decision requires a fresh review. A seasoned Canadian tax litigation lawyer can present submissions that address the expanded record and ensure procedural rights are protected.
Key Takeaways for Professionals Using EFILE
This case illustrates that the Federal Court will generally defer to CRA decisions where the process is transparent and supported by evidence. It also shows that decision-makers may rely on different criteria during redetermination, provided the final reasoning aligns with the statutory mandate. Compliance with CRA warnings and clear documentation of interactions remain essential to retaining EFILE access.
Pro Tax Tips for EFILE Participants
- Maintain organized records of all CRA communications, including warnings, deadlines, and phone discussions.
- Review EFILE suitability criteria regularly to ensure internal processes remain aligned with CRA expectations.
- If your practice includes temporary foreign workers or deemed residents, confirm filing eligibility before transmitting returns.
- Engage an experienced Canadian tax lawyer immediately if you receive a suspension notice, as early intervention often shapes the direction of judicial review.
- Where suspension decisions are remitted for redetermination, prepare thorough submissions addressing any new issues raised.
Frequently Asked Questions About EFILE Suspensions
What gives CRA the authority to suspend a preparer from EFILE?
CRA enforces suitability rules designed to protect the integrity of the electronic filing program. Filing for excluded individuals or engaging in conduct that raises suitability concerns may result in suspension.
Do CRA officers conducting a redetermination have to follow the original reasoning?
No. A fresh review allows CRA to rely on different suitability criteria if supported by the evidence gathered during the process.
Is the failure to respond to an extension request a breach of fairness?
Not automatically. If the preparer was still given meaningful opportunity to provide submissions and those submissions were reviewed, fairness is generally satisfied.
Why are filings for temporary foreign workers or deemed residents risky?
If the individuals fall within an excluded category and CRA has issued warnings, continuing to electronically file those returns may lead to suspension. Additional guidance is available in CRA’s EFILE program overview.
DISCLAIMER: This article provides broad information. It is only accurate as of the posting date. It has not been updated and may be out-of-date. It does not give legal advice and should not be relied on as tax advice. Every tax scenario is unique to its circumstances and will differ from the instances described in the article. If you have specific legal questions, you should seek the advice of a Canadian tax lawyer.
About the Author
